Tenure extension of ED Director Sanjay Kumar Mishra illegal: Amicus Curiae KV Viswanathan to Supreme Court
Viswanathan explained that the issue was not about the incumbent Director at all, but was about the principle.
Social Justice
Viswanathan explained that the issue was not about the incumbent Director at all, but was about the principle.
A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad dismissed a bunch of petitions challenging the Central government’s scheme.
A Supreme Court bench said that history of the country should not haunt its present and future generations.
The Court stated that the petitioner is selectively reexamining the past and takes issue with labelling an entire culture as ‘barbaric’.
Published On: July 21, 2022 The 10th EU-India Human Rights Dialogue was organised on July 15, 2022 in New Delhi. On the occasion, both India and the…
The Supreme Court had earlier refused to accept in a sealed cover the Centre’s suggestion on a proposed panel of experts for strengthening regulatory measures…
Observing that the issue falls under the policy domain of the government, a bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud disposed of the petition and…
The top court said India will have to go back to its core values and character if it has to truly become what it is…
While refusing to order a CBI probe in the matter, a bench of Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar said the Bombay High Court has…
The Court made the observation while granting bail to two men accused of raping a woman in Varanasi in 2019.