“Flawed”: Supreme Court On Karnataka Muslim Quota Cut Before Polls
The Supreme Court said it appeared that the Karnataka government’s decision was based on an “absolutely fallacious assumption”.
Social Justice
The Supreme Court said it appeared that the Karnataka government’s decision was based on an “absolutely fallacious assumption”.
The complaint filed by Satyaki Savarkar stated that Gandhi had been “repeatedly defaming” Savarkar on various occasions over the years.
The Court made the observation while temporarily restraining Nirmal Kumar, former State President of the BJP’s IT wing, from making unsubstantiated allegations of corruption against…
A division bench of Chief Justice S Manikumar and Justice Shaji P Chaly dismissed the plea on the ground that the movie had already been…
A bench of Justices Krishna Murari and Ahsanuddin Amanullah issued directions in this regard to the registrars of all the High Courts.
During the arguments today, Gandhi questioned the complainant’s logic in claiming that 13 crore people with Modi surname were defamed when the total population of…
Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Sidharth Luthra, appearing for the two convicts Hardik Sikri and Karan Chhabra respectively, argued that the offence of gang rape…
The Court opined that at present, the 15-day period can get over by the time a higher court sets aside a decision denying custody.
Hindustani had on April 1 allegedly delivered a hate speech targeting a particular community, during the Ram Navami celebrations in Una after which there were…
The forum noted that the complainant was under the impression that the lawyer he engaged would continue representing him till a favourable order was obtained.