Latest posts
-
DNA Tests Encompass Right to Privacy, Cannot Be Performed as A Matter of Course: Supreme Court

The top court set aside the direction of a trial court that ordered DNA testing of two girls who were alleged to be born out of a forced physical relationship between the complainant and her brother-in-law
-
тАШState Governed by Rule of Law, Not Rule of MenтАЩ: HC Orders KтАЩtaka Govt to Allot Properties Only Via Public Auctions

A bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna passed the order in a writ petition, questioning the allotment of 700 sqm at the Fish Conservation Centre, Malpe, Udupi as a special case. Allot properties only by way of public auction and not as a product of favouritism or political interference by terming them special, the Karnataka High…
-
Verdict pertains to recall process, not outcome: opposition

Opposition parties argued on Monday that the Supreme Court order was not an endorsement of the Narendra Modi government’s demonetisation decision of 2016 since it pertained only to the procedure followed for the currency notes recall, even as they privately conceded that the majority verdict had put to rest the remnants of their political plank
-
SARFAESI – Burden Is On Borrower To Prove That Secured Properties Are Agricultural Lands : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that, in SARFAESI proceedings, the burden is upon the borrower to prove that the secured properties are agricultural lands and actually being used as agricultural lands and/or agricultural activities. In this case, the DRT, while dismissing the Securitization Application filed by the borrowers observed that the land in question were not
-
рд╕реБрдкреНрд░реАрдо рдХреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдиреЗ рдУрдмреАрд╕реА рдХреЛрдЯрд╛ рдХреЗ рдмрд┐рдирд╛ рдпреВрдкреА рд╕реНрдерд╛рдиреАрдп рдирд┐рдХрд╛рдп рдЪреБрдирд╛рд╡ рдХрд░рд╛рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рдЗрд▓рд╛рд╣рд╛рдмрд╛рдж рд╣рд╛рдИрдХреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдХреЗ рдирд┐рд░реНрджреЗрд╢ рдкрд░ рд░реЛрдХ рд▓рдЧрд╛рдИ

Posted On | 4 Jan 2023 6:48 PM рд╕реБрдкреНрд░реАрдо рдХреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдиреЗ рдмреБрдзрд╡рд╛рд░ рдХреЛ рдЙрддреНрддрд░ рдкреНрд░рджреЗрд╢ рд░рд╛рдЬреНрдп рдЪреБрдирд╛рд╡ рдЖрдпреЛрдЧ рдХреЛ рдУрдмреАрд╕реА рдЖрд░рдХреНрд╖рдг рдХреЗ рдмрд┐рдирд╛ рд╢рд╣рд░реА рд╕реНрдерд╛рдиреАрдп рдирд┐рдХрд╛рдп рдЪреБрдирд╛рд╡реЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдЕрдзрд┐рд╕реВрдЪрд┐рдд рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рдЗрд▓рд╛рд╣рд╛рдмрд╛рдж рд╣рд╛рдИрдХреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдХреЗ рдирд┐рд░реНрджреЗрд╢ рдкрд░ рд░реЛрдХ рд▓рдЧрд╛ рджреАред рдХреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдиреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рд╣реА рдЙрди рд╕реНрдерд╛рдиреАрдп рдирд┐рдХрд╛рдпреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕реБрдЪрд╛рд░реБ рдкреНрд░рд╢рд╛рд╕рди рд╕реБрдирд┐рд╢реНрдЪрд┐рдд рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдЬрд┐рдирдХреА рд╢рд░реНрддреЗрдВ
-
Non-Banking Finance & Leasing Companies Not Liable To Pay Interest Tax On Instalments Paid Under Hire Purchase Agreement : Supreme Court

Posted On | 5 Jan 2023 10:23 AM The Supreme Court has held that non-banking finance and leasing companies are not liable to pay tax on the interest component included in the hire-purchase instalment paid under the hire purchase agreement. Issue for Consideration in the Civil Appeal A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and M
-
Section 5 Limitation Act – ‘Suffficient Cause’ Is The Cause For Which A Party Could Not Be Blamed : Supreme Court

Posted On:5 Jan 2023 10:37 AM The Supreme Court, in a judgment delivered on Wednesday, gave a simple and short definition for the term ‘sufficient cause’ in Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. тАШSufficient CauseтАЩ is the cause for which a party could not be blamed , Justice C T Ravikumar, who authored the judgment,
-
Anti-Conversion Law: Supreme Court To Hear Appeal Against High Court Order

The high court, in an interim order, had directed the state government not to prosecute under Section 10 of the MP Freedom of Religion Act (MPFRA) adults who solemnise their marriage on their own volition.
-
Additional Restrictions Not Found In Article 19(2) Cannot Be Imposed On Right To Free Speech : Supreme Court

3 Jan 2023 10:49 AM The Supreme Court Constitution Bench comprising Justices S. Abdul Nazeer, B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian and B.V. Nagarathna has held that additional restrictions, not found in Article 19(2), cannot be imposed on the exercise of right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a) of Ministers, MPs and MLAs. It held
-
RBI Didn’t Independently Apply Its Mind In Recommending Demonetisation, Entire Exercise Carried Out In 24 Hours : Justice BV Nagarathna

2 Jan 2023 1:41 PM In her dissenting judgment in the pleas challenging demonetisation, Supreme Court judge Justice BV Nagarathna observed that there was no independent application of mind by the Reserve Bank of India in recommending the cancellation of entire Rs.500 and Rs.1000 notes as proposed by the Central Government. Justice Nagarathna formed this