Latest posts
-
Section 5 Limitation Act – ‘Suffficient Cause’ Is The Cause For Which A Party Could Not Be Blamed : Supreme Court
Posted On:5 Jan 2023 10:37 AM The Supreme Court, in a judgment delivered on Wednesday, gave a simple and short definition for the term ‘sufficient cause’ in Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. ‘Sufficient Cause’ is the cause for which a party could not be blamed , Justice C T Ravikumar, who authored the judgment,
-
“All conversions not illegal”: Supreme Court refuses to stay Madhya Pradesh HC order against declaration of religious conversion before DM
A bench of Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar issued notice on the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh government against the High Court verdict.
-
Additional Restrictions Not Found In Article 19(2) Cannot Be Imposed On Right To Free Speech : Supreme Court
3 Jan 2023 10:49 AM The Supreme Court Constitution Bench comprising Justices S. Abdul Nazeer, B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian and B.V. Nagarathna has held that additional restrictions, not found in Article 19(2), cannot be imposed on the exercise of right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a) of Ministers, MPs and MLAs. It held
-
“Burden To Prove Mental Incapacity Is On The Defence” : Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Of Man Accused Of Killing His Two Sons
2023-01-03 03:55:24 Rejecting his plea of mental incapacity, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a man accused of killing his two sons. “Where the accused is charged of murder, the burden to prove that as a result of unsoundness of mind, the accused was incapable of knowing the consequences of his acts is on
-
RBI Didn’t Independently Apply Its Mind In Recommending Demonetisation, Entire Exercise Carried Out In 24 Hours : Justice BV Nagarathna
2 Jan 2023 1:41 PM In her dissenting judgment in the pleas challenging demonetisation, Supreme Court judge Justice BV Nagarathna observed that there was no independent application of mind by the Reserve Bank of India in recommending the cancellation of entire Rs.500 and Rs.1000 notes as proposed by the Central Government. Justice Nagarathna formed this
-
Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board
Date:06Dec2022 Learned counsel for the contemnor would submit that petitioner father has already field an application under section 156(3) of the I.P.C. before the concerning J.M.F.C, Raipur and the learned Judicial Magistrate has already taken cognizance of the matter, therefore, the object of filling of this petition has already been achieved. Considering this aspect of
-
Unexplained Inordinate Delay Can Be A Very Crucial Factor For Quashing A Criminal Complaint: Supreme Court
Ashok KM 17 Dec 2022 9:08 AM